Get a direct initial read on the issue.
If this issue matches what you are dealing with, start with a short, non-confidential summary. For qualifying serious matters, contingency may be available once the claim and economics are assessed.
Look first at economic weight
Not every asset problem justifies special counsel. The first question is whether the claim is large enough to matter after accounting for uncertainty, timing, and the likely path to recovery.
That means looking at the practical stakes: claim size, asset value, project exposure, likely coverage or collectability, and whether recovery could materially affect the estate or receivership.
Then look at the funding mismatch
Many strong claims sit inside structures that cannot justify years of hourly litigation. The estate may be cash-poor even when the claim is economically important. That does not mean the claim should be ignored. It means the structure of the engagement matters.
A contingency-only, costs-advanced model can be attractive when the claim is real, the potential recovery is meaningful, and the fiduciary wants a fast read without opening a new hourly drain.
Timing pressure matters
Claims do not wait for perfect case administration. A trustee or receiver may step into a matter after the record has already started to harden. Insurance narratives may already be forming. Project participants may already be defending themselves. Key communications and consultants may already be drifting away.
That is why the first question is often not “can we prove everything now?” It is “is this a claim whose value gets harder to preserve if no one owns it now?”
Define the role narrowly
The cleanest fiduciary engagements usually have a narrow role. Special counsel is not trustee counsel or receiver counsel. The role is the claim itself: insurance, defect, delay, rent loss, or another focused recovery dispute. That keeps the engagement manageable and lets estate or receivership counsel stay in their existing roles.
Gather enough to make a real decision
A full file is not necessary for an initial read. Usually the right first materials are a concise factual summary, the key claim documents, any core contract or policy, the current consultant or repair view, and the basic economic picture. A quick, commercially grounded initial read is often more valuable than waiting for perfect file assembly.
When focused special counsel often makes sense
Focused special counsel often makes sense when the fiduciary can see a potentially valuable claim but does not want the estate or receivership to absorb open-ended hourly spend before deciding whether the issue is worth pursuing. That is especially true when timing matters, the claim is tied to a materially exposed asset or project, and the record is still shapeable.
Why owners, fiduciaries, and referral counsel call Burnside.
Kelly McCann’s background combines finance training, construction cost-estimating work, legal training, and graduate real-estate study. He has recovered millions of dollars for property owners through trial, arbitration, and settlement.
Illustrative fiduciary scenario where claim value is at risk of drifting
A cash-constrained structure may still control a meaningful claim while the record continues to harden.
Useful when a trustee, receiver, or similar decision-maker needs a narrow read on whether the issue is worth preserving and how to keep it commercially coherent.
Early claim mapping matters most when nobody has yet taken ownership of the recovery story.
Illustrative scenarios are shown in summary form only. They are not client descriptions and do not guarantee outcomes.